A Broken History: Examining the Events, Experiences, and Narratives of the High Arctic Relocations, 1950-2010

Abstract

In 1953, the Canadian government moved thirty-five Inuit from Inukjuak in Northern Québec to the High Arctic with promises of better hunting opportunities and the ability to return to their communities within two years if conditions were not to their liking. Two years later, twenty-nine additional Inuit were sent to join them. Since these High Arctic Relocations, government officials, lawyers, and academics have questioned the federal government’s motivations for and responses to the relocations, focusing on the question of whether the government was justified in undertaking an ill-fated humanitarian mission or if the government coerced Inuit into staking Canadian claims to the Arctic.

This dissertation explores the legacy and ongoing influence of the relocations in Canadian history by tracing the documentary, experiential, and political narratives surrounding the High Arctic Relocations from the 1950s to the 2010s. This includes critically re-examining the archival evidence from the 1950s; analyzing Inuit testimony of experiences and contemporary storytelling about the relocations; and examining Inuit, government, and academic political narratives from the 1980s through the 2010s. By examining the narratives of the High Arctic Relocations and framing these narratives using the event, experiences, and memory of relocation over the course of seven decades, this study parses the evolving themes and foci as Inuit struggled to secure recognition and compensation for their suffering. This dissertation re-assesses the government’s motivations for relocating Inuit in the early 1950s and includes analysis of the complexities and limits of government decision-making. It also explores the effects of those decisions on Inuit relocatees through an examination of remembered experiences in the 1990s. Finally, this dissertation analyzes the academic and government framing of the narratives of relocation since the 1990s, investigating how these narratives affect contemporary perceptions of government actions.

This dissertation demonstrates that the intentions of government officials in the 1950s (the event) and vigorous debate about the perceived motivations of government have superseded the outcomes (experience) of the relocations. This evolving discourse has produced generally-accepted conclusions in Canadian history about the alleged motivations for the relocations that find little grounding in the archival record but which have become a key part of the meta-narrative about state sovereignty, deceit, and coercion in the twentieth century Canadian Arctic.