The Libraries will be performing routine maintenance on UWSpace on October 20th, 2025, from 10:00-10:30 pm ET. UWSpace will be unavailable during this time. Service should resume by 10:30 pm ET.
 

Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods for control of home battery storage systems in distribution grids

dc.contributor.authorMueller, Felicitas
dc.contributor.authorde Jongh, Steven
dc.contributor.authorCañizares, Claudio A.
dc.contributor.authorLeibfried, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Kankar
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T15:02:55Z
dc.date.available2025-09-10T15:02:55Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-02
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465. © 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.description.abstractControl methods for Home Energy Management Systems implemented with traditional optimization techniques and state-of-the-art Machine Learning methods are presented and compared in this paper in the context of their impact on and interactions with Active Distribution Networks. Thus, model-based methods based on Model Predictive Control algorithms with different prediction qualities are first described and compared against model-free methods based on imitation learning and reinforcement learning. A practical, state-of-the-art, heuristic, rule-based controller is used as the baseline. An in-depth comparison is performed using metrics consisting of objective function values, grid constraint violations, and computational time. The results of applying these Home Energy Management Systems to a realistic German low voltage benchmark grid with 13 connected households, each containing solar generation, a battery storage system, and electrical loads are discussed. It is demonstrated that model-based and model-free methods can achieve improvements over typical rule-based methods, with varying performance in terms of objective function values and grid constraint violations depending on the forecasts, at the cost of higher computational complexity. Furthermore, model-free methods are shown to have in general low computational burden at higher objective function values with more grid constraint violations, with imitation-learning-based techniques proving to be the best compromise for practical applications.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe financial support for this research was provided by Mitacs Canada, as well as the University of Waterloo and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology to conduct research in the field of energy system optimization.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/22372
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Energy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesApplied Energy; 400; 126465
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectactive distribution networks
dc.subjecthome energy management system
dc.subjectimitation learning
dc.subjectmodel predictive control
dc.subjectneural networks
dc.subjectoptimal storage scheduling
dc.subjectreinforcement learning
dc.titleComparison of machine learning and MPC methods for control of home battery storage systems in distribution grids
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMueller, F., de Jongh, S., Cañizares, C. A., Leibfried, T., & Bhattacharya, K. (2025). Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods for control of home battery storage systems in distribution grids. Applied Energy, 400, 126465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465
oaire.citation.volume400
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineering
uws.contributor.affiliation2Electrical and Computer Engineering
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelFaculty
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods_AAM.pdf
Size:
2.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: