Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods for control of home battery storage systems in distribution grids
dc.contributor.author | Mueller, Felicitas | |
dc.contributor.author | de Jongh, Steven | |
dc.contributor.author | Cañizares, Claudio A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Leibfried, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Bhattacharya, Kankar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-10T15:02:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-10T15:02:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-08-02 | |
dc.description | The final publication is available at Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465. © 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.description.abstract | Control methods for Home Energy Management Systems implemented with traditional optimization techniques and state-of-the-art Machine Learning methods are presented and compared in this paper in the context of their impact on and interactions with Active Distribution Networks. Thus, model-based methods based on Model Predictive Control algorithms with different prediction qualities are first described and compared against model-free methods based on imitation learning and reinforcement learning. A practical, state-of-the-art, heuristic, rule-based controller is used as the baseline. An in-depth comparison is performed using metrics consisting of objective function values, grid constraint violations, and computational time. The results of applying these Home Energy Management Systems to a realistic German low voltage benchmark grid with 13 connected households, each containing solar generation, a battery storage system, and electrical loads are discussed. It is demonstrated that model-based and model-free methods can achieve improvements over typical rule-based methods, with varying performance in terms of objective function values and grid constraint violations depending on the forecasts, at the cost of higher computational complexity. Furthermore, model-free methods are shown to have in general low computational burden at higher objective function values with more grid constraint violations, with imitation-learning-based techniques proving to be the best compromise for practical applications. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | The financial support for this research was provided by Mitacs Canada, as well as the University of Waterloo and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology to conduct research in the field of energy system optimization. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0306-2619 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10012/22372 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Applied Energy | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Applied Energy; 400; 126465 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | active distribution networks | |
dc.subject | home energy management system | |
dc.subject | imitation learning | |
dc.subject | model predictive control | |
dc.subject | neural networks | |
dc.subject | optimal storage scheduling | |
dc.subject | reinforcement learning | |
dc.title | Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods for control of home battery storage systems in distribution grids | |
dc.type | Article | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Mueller, F., de Jongh, S., Cañizares, C. A., Leibfried, T., & Bhattacharya, K. (2025). Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods for control of home battery storage systems in distribution grids. Applied Energy, 400, 126465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126465 | |
oaire.citation.volume | 400 | |
uws.contributor.affiliation1 | Faculty of Engineering | |
uws.contributor.affiliation2 | Electrical and Computer Engineering | |
uws.peerReviewStatus | Reviewed | |
uws.scholarLevel | Faculty | |
uws.typeOfResource | Text | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Comparison of machine learning and MPC methods_AAM.pdf
- Size:
- 2.01 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 4.47 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: