Proactive Characterization of Wildfire Impacts on Drinking Water Treatability

Abstract

Forested catchments are important sources of drinking water globally. They are increasingly threatened by disturbances, prominently climate shocks, including large wildfires. Wildfires alter watershed hydrology and biogeochemistry, leading to reduced infiltration, increased overland flow, and enhanced delivery of sediments, burned vegetation, and pyrogenic material into aquatic systems. Such inputs can alter drinking water source quality and challenge treatability. Ash is the residual material from wildland fuel combustion, composed of mineral particles and organic matter that can leach into water. While inorganic dissolved compounds from ash can impact water quality by, for example, increasing ionic strength and alkalinity, water-extractable organic matter (WEOM) from wildfire ash contributes to increased post-fire dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations. During drinking water treatment, higher DOC concentrations increase chemical demand (e.g., coagulant, disinfectant), enhance the formation of potentially harmful disinfection by-products (DBPs), cause taste and odor issues, and promote bacterial regrowth in distribution systems. These impacts may also necessitate new infrastructure to manage changes in source water quality, ultimately increasing overall treatment costs. Although they cannot reflect all watershed processes, bench-scale evaluations provide valuable insights into wildfire impacts on drinking water treatability by isolating treatment-relevant mechanisms at controlled laboratory conditions. However, different approaches used to prepare wildfire ash-impacted waters (WAIWs) limit the inferences that can be drawn from them. Here, key factors (e.g., mixing duration and condition, ash-to-water ratio, and source water quality) that can impact organic matter leaching from wildfire ash to water were investigated. WEOM concentration increased within the first 24 hours of mixing before plateauing or declining as mixing progressed, regardless of ash type and background water source. Continuous mixing yielded higher WEOM concentrations than stagnant conditions, indicating that particle-particle interactions and surface exposure enhanced leaching. WEOM yield also decreased as ash-to-water ratios increased. Despite anecdotal suggestions, a relationship between wildfire ash color and WEOM concentration was not observed (Chapter 2). Wildfire ash collection methods may also impact inferences drawn from bench-scale drinking water treatability assessments. Unburned vegetation, rocks, or other debris may have physico-chemical properties different from those of ash deposits; thus, increasing uncertainty in treatability assessments. Dry ash homogenization methods (i.e., manual separation, sieving, and pulverization) were investigated because they may mitigate these impacts. Sieving was shown to be the most practical and reliable method for ensuring ash homogeneity. Pulverization enhanced organic matter release from large particles by increasing surface area, but it also generated aerosolized ash, complicating sample handling. In addition, pulverization altered WEOM character, potentially by increasing the availability of smaller organic matter compounds previously encapsulated within ash particles or by mechanically fragmenting larger organic molecules into smaller compounds (Chapter 3). Subsequent investigations examined the role of settleable ash solids (SAS), a previously overlooked fraction of wildfire ash. SAS substantially increased water alkalinity and make pH control for coagulation extremely difficult. Although pH adjustment enhances DOC removal from WAIW, SAS increased acid demand substantially. The removal of SAS reduced both alkalinity and acid demand; however, as ionic strength was concurrently reduced, floc formation and turbidity reduction for a given coagulant dose decreased somewhat. A limited complementary analysis was conducted to evaluate whether atmospheric ash deposition could also act as a significant driver of source water quality and treatability change. While the impact of atmospheric deposition of ash on water alkalinity depends on the surface area of water body, only exceptionally high atmospheric ash loading could meaningfully alter source water alkalinity in reservoirs that hold large volume of water (Chapter 4). Wildfire ash alters multiple aspects of water quality concurrently, including turbidity, DOC concentration and character, and alkalinity, so its overall implications for water treatment cannot be adequately assessed by examining individual mechanisms in isolation. Coagulation experiments with WAIWs demonstrated these interacting impacts. At low coagulant (i.e., alum) doses, turbidity was effectively reduced, yet DOC removal remained limited, despite pH adjustment to coagulant-specific optima. Enhanced coagulation combined with higher alum doses improved DOC removal but introduced trade-offs, as turbidity reduction declined somewhat because of reduced ionic strength associated with decreased alkalinity. The results indicated, while wildfire ash can severely deteriorate water quality by increasing turbidity, alkalinity, DOC concentration, and aromaticity, which may increase coagulant demand or necessitate more advanced treatment methods, the underlying coagulation mechanisms for WAIW remain consistent with those in natural waters. Thus, wildfire ash does not present fundamentally new challenges to coagulation; rather, the magnitude of water quality changes following wildfire can pose risk to treatment performance and operational resilience (Chapter 5). Collectively, this research demonstrates that while bench-scale studies cannot fully replicate the complexity of post-fire watershed processes and wildfire impacts on water quality, they remain essential for isolating and investigating the specific effects of wildfire ash on drinking water treatment processes. Accordingly, it is practical to adopt methods that maximize the extraction of organic matter from wildfire ash and represent worst-case treatment scenarios. These methodological insights help ensure the comparability of bench-scale investigations. This work also shows that wildfire impacts coagulation primarily by complicating pH control and deteriorating drinking water source quality, increasing the need for more intensive treatment processes. Overall, this research establishes a robust methodological foundation for reliably assessing wildfire ash impacts on water quality and for informing the development of strategies to mitigate wildfire impacts on drinking water treatability.