Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review

dc.contributor.authorSanyal, Chiranjeev
dc.contributor.authorStolee, Paul
dc.contributor.authorJuzwishin, Don
dc.contributor.authorHusereau, Don
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-14T13:57:41Z
dc.date.available2026-05-14T13:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-13
dc.description© 2018 Sanyal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.abstractBackground Innovations in eHealth technologies have the potential to help older adult live independently, maintain their quality of life, and to reduce their health system dependency and health care expenditure. The objective of this study was to systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness or utility studies assessing eHealth technologies in study populations involving older adults. Methods We systematically searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, NHS EED, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2000 to 2016 that examined cost-effectiveness (or utility) of eHealth technologies. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. Results Eleven full text articles met the inclusion criteria representing public and private health care systems. eHealth technologies evaluated by these studies includes computerized decision support system, a web-based physical activity intervention, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy, telecare, and telehealth. Overall, the reporting quality of the studies included in the review was varied. Most studied demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an intervention using a randomized control trial and statistical modeling, respectively. This review found limited information on the feasibility of adopting these technologies based on economic and organizational factors. Conclusions This review identified few economic evaluations of eHealth technologies that included older adults. The quality of the current evidence is limited and further research is warranted to clearly demonstrate the long-term cost-effectiveness of eHealth technologies from the health care system and societal perspectives.
dc.description.sponsorshipAGE-WELL (Aging Gracefully Across Environments using Technology to Support Wellness, Engagement and Long Life), Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada (NCE).
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198112
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/23321
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE; 13(6); e0198112
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectelderly
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness analysis
dc.subjecthealth informatics
dc.subjectcomparators
dc.subjecthealth economics
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trials
dc.subjectregression analysis
dc.subjectsystematic reviews
dc.titleEconomic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSanyal C, Stolee P, Juzwishin D, Husereau D (2018) Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0198112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198112
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Health
uws.contributor.affiliation2School of Public Health Sciences
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelFaculty
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file (67).pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: