Browsing by Author "Zambroni de Souza, Matheus F."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item A Review of Modeling and Applications of Energy Storage Systems in Power Grids(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2022-03-25) Calero, Fabian; Cañizares, Claudio A.; Bhattacharya, Kankar; Anierobi, Chioma; Calero, Ivan; Zambroni de Souza, Matheus F.; Farrokhabadi, Mostafa; Guzman, Noela Sofia; Mendieta, William; Peralta, Dario; Solanki, Bharatkumar V.; Padmanabhan, Nitin; Violante, WalterAs the penetration of variable renewable generation increases in power systems, issues, such as grid stiffness, larger frequency deviations, and grid stability, are becoming more relevant, particularly in view of 100% renewable energy networks, which is the future of smart grids. In this context, energy storage systems (ESSs) are proving to be indispensable for facilitating the integration of renewable energy sources (RESs), are being widely deployed in both microgrids and bulk power systems, and thus will be the hallmark of the clean electrical grids of the future. Hence, this article reviews several energy storage technologies that are rapidly evolving to address the RES integration challenge, particularly compressed air energy storage (CAES), flywheels, batteries, and thermal ESSs, and their modeling and applications in power grids. An overview of these ESSs is provided, focusing on new models and applications in microgrids and distribution and transmission grids for grid operation, markets, stability, and control.Item Affine Policies and Principal Components Analysis for Self-Scheduling in CAES Facilities(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2022-07-26) Zambroni de Souza, Matheus F.; Cañizares, Claudio A.; Bhattacharya, Kankar; Lorca, AlvaroThis paper presents a novel methodology based on Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Affine Policies (AP) for self-scheduling of a price-taker Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) facility operating under uncertainties. The proposed PCA-AP model is developed from the facility owner's perspective, which partakes in energy, spinning, and idle reserve markets. A methodology is proposed to select the required price uncertainty intervals from actual data based on a Box Cox technique. For a more realistic representation, the detailed thermodynamic characteristics of the CAES facility are considered, taking into account as well modern CAES facilities that may charge and discharge concurrently. To validate the proposed PCA-AP model and approach, the results obtained are compared with an existing Affine Arithmetic (AA) model, which is also based on an affine approach, and Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS), which can be considered as the benchmark for comparison purposes. The input data, forecast prices and intervals of uncertainty, are taken from the Ontario-Canada electricity market for 2015-2019. From the studies presented, it can be observed that the new PCA-AP approach provides less conservative results as compared to the AA approach, and hence can be considered an adequate methodology for day-ahead operations in systems with significant sources of uncertainty.Item Self-Scheduling Models of a CAES Facility Under Uncertainties(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2021-01-06) Zambroni de Souza, Matheus F.; Canizares, Claudio A.; Bhattacharya, KankarThis paper presents two mathematical formulations to represent uncertainties in self-scheduling models of a price-taker Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) facility. The proposed model is from the point of view of the plant owner participating in the energy, spinning, and idle reserve markets. The first described formulation is based on Robust Optimization (RO) and the second one is based on Affine Arithmetic (AA) techniques, which are both range arithmetic methodologies, and consider the thermodynamic characteristics of the CAES facility for a more realistic representation. The implementation of both methods are tested, validated and compared with each other and with Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS) using prices from the Ontario market. From the simulation results, it can be observed that both methods have some similarities, presenting lower computational burden compared with MCS, and demonstrate the advantage of applying the proposed models for CAES plant owners to hedge against price uncertainties.