Browsing by Author "Haghighi, Paniz"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Examining the Association between Functional Social Support, Marital Status, and Memory in Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Canada: A Mixed Methods Study
    (University of Waterloo, 2025-09-29) Haghighi, Paniz
    Although several studies have found that functional social support (FSS) promotes memory through stress-buffering mechanisms, the role of marital status in shaping this association remains underexplored. This thesis – a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study – is the first research to examine whether marital status modifies the association between FSS and memory in community-dwelling, middle-aged and older adults (45-85 years old). Data for the quantitative portion of the study were obtained from the Tracking Cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Memory was regressed on FSS, adjusting for various sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-related covariates, in a linear mixed effects model. The moderating effect of marital status was assessed by adding its interaction with FSS to the model. Results showed significant and positive adjusted associations for overall FSS (β: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.13) and two FSS subtypes, namely positive interactions (β: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.11) and affectionate support (β: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.11), with memory. However, the interaction between marital status and FSS (overall and subtypes) was not statistically significant (likelihood ratio test p-value = 0.75), indicating that FSS did not have differing effects on memory according to marital status. Two sensitivity analyses – one stratifying the sample by baseline marital status and another comparing different missing data approaches – confirmed the initial findings. For the qualitative portion, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of 18 community-dwelling adults who resembled the CLSA population and reported different categories of marital status. Each interview was audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed with the goal of explaining and contextualizing the quantitative results. Three major themes emerged from the interviews to help explain why marital status, contrary to a priori expectations, did not impact the FSS-memory association: “learning to cope” – participants used other alternatives besides a spouse to deal with memory challenges; “context matters” – contextual factors such as marital quality may affect this association; and, “doing more harm than good” – some spouses may provide too much support, reducing participants’ autonomy to stimulate their own cognitive processes. The thesis findings highlight the complexity of marital relationships and emphasize the need to consider factors such as satisfaction with one’s marital status and adequacy of support to provide a comprehensive understanding of how social and marital dynamics impact cognitive trajectories. This research suggests public health initiatives focused on enhancing social support could promote cognitive health in aging populations, regardless of marital status.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The association between functional social support, marital status and memory in middle-aged and older adults: An analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
    (Elsevier, 2025) Haghighi, Paniz; Zeng, Leilei; Tyas, Suzanne L; Meyer, Samantha B; Oremus, Mark
    Purpose Although several studies have reported positive associations between functional social support (FSS) and memory, few have explored how other social variables, such as marital status, may affect the magnitude and direction of this association. We examined whether marital status modifies the association between FSS and memory in a sample of community-dwelling, middle-aged and older adults. Methods Data at three timepoints, spanning six years, were analyzed from the Tracking Cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (n = 10,318). Linear mixed models were used to regress memory onto FSS across all three timepoints, adjusting for multiple covariates. The moderating effect of marital status was assessed by adding its interaction with FSS in the model. Separate regression models were built for overall FSS and four subtypes (positive interactions, affectionate, emotional/informational, and tangible support). Results We found significant and positive adjusted associations for overall FSS (β: 0.07; 95 % CI: 0.01, 0.13), positive interactions (β: 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.01, 0.11), and affectionate support (β: 0.05; 95 % CI: 0.00, 0.11) with memory. However, the interaction between marital status and FSS (overall and subtypes) was not statistically significant (likelihood ratio test p-value = 0.75), indicating that FSS does not have differing effects on memory depending on marital status. Conclusion Our findings do not provide evidence to suggest that marital status affects the association between FSS and memory in middle-aged and older adults. Nonetheless, policymakers and practitioners should take a comprehensive approach when exploring how various dimensions of social relationships may uniquely influence cognitive trajectories.